Modern OSes are usually able to determine on their own how a drive is supposed to be addressed. Even back when LBA addressing was young, and disks were accessed via the BIOS, it should have been possible to simply probe for the availability of the appropriate interrupt 13h calls and fall back to the CHS version if they are absent. The additional partition IDs therefore seem redundant.
What was ... partitioning - What is the difference between 'LBA' and 'non-LBA' IDs ... 0 How to interpret this LBA number? The authoritative source is the ATA/ATAPI Specification, which is the basic command set used by SATA devices.
lba sports, According to Section 3.1.37 LBA (Logical Block Address), an LBA is the 'value used to reference a logical sector'. 7 LBA itself can apply to any sector size, but hard drive sector sizes have been 512 bytes since the start of the PC, and all hardware and software has been hard-coded with that assumption. So rather than wait for new systems and operating systems to support 4K sectors, the drive will appear externally as a 512-byte sector drive. Here is the trick…During manufacturing, the layout of the LBA blocks occurs by shifting the LBA block sequence past the “Bad” sector. The LBA layer simply skips over the identified “Bad” location in the “P” list and continues sequentially in LBA order.
lba sports, When I try to format a new SD Card with diskpart: format fs=fat32 I always end up with partition ID 0x0c, aka FAT32 with LBA Addressing. I tried boot with this but the embedded device is apparently not compatible with LBA. Is there a different diskpart command for creating FAT32 with CHS addressing? diskpart - How do select FAT32 CHS vs LBA - Super User Well, that, and perhaps wave our hands wildly in the air for emphasis. LBA is an acronym for Logical Block Addressing. In this case I assume it is just another, possibly more technically accurate way of referring to a "bad sector".
Unless your hard drive is very old, the file system of your OS probably didn't even know anything had happened.